In our Warsaw to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 41 minutes, completing the 1586km route in 15h 11min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 220's 500km range doesn't beat the Audi A6 Avant e-tron's 478km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron
- Total time: 15h 11min (41 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 55min
- Energy: ~249 kWh
- Distance: 1586km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
15h 11min |
15h 52min |
| Charging time: |
55min |
1h 35min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~285 kWh |
~285 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 38% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
EnBW Schnellladepark (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (13 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aachener Land Nord (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (10 min, 11% → 56%)
- Arrival: Paris
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Walewice (11 min, 13% → 41%)
-
Stop 2:
Circle K Autohof Ferch (13 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (12 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (24 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Aachener Land Nord (19 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (16 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron achieved a 41-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 1586km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 55min vs 1h 35min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~249 kWh vs ~276 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons