In our Warsaw to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Maxus MIFA 9 by 123 minutes, completing the 1760km route in 17h 35min. The key advantage? 8 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 35min (123 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 56min
- Energy: ~287 kWh
- Distance: 1760km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Maxus MIFA 9 |
| Travel time |
17h 35min |
19h 38min |
| Charging time: |
56min |
2h 57min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~317 kWh |
~317 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 34% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Tankstelle Hirschstettner Straße (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Rome
Maxus MIFA 9 Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 28% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 21% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Signalbau (10 min, 14% → 37%)
-
Stop 4:
Teplárny Brno Olympia DC (17 min, 13% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Raststation (11 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 8:
Electra Pizza Plus (13 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 9:
Ledra Ovest (16 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 10:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (16 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 11:
Castel Bentivoglio Ovest (12 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 12:
Ristorante Goyo (19 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 13:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (17 min, 10% → 51%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 123-minute advantage over Maxus MIFA 9 on this 1760km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 56min vs 2h 57min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~287 kWh vs ~440 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons