In our Warsaw to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model 3 Long-Range by 27 minutes, completing the 1760km route in 17h 35min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 35min (27 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 56min
- Energy: ~287 kWh
- Distance: 1760km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range |
| Travel time |
17h 35min |
18h 2min |
| Charging time: |
56min |
1h 20min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~317 kWh |
~317 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 34% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Tankstelle Hirschstettner Straße (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Rome
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Moya (10 min, 20% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
MOL Kroměřížská (10 min, 22% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Raststation Bad Fischau (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 5:
Ledra Ovest (14 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 6:
Ewiva Parco Commerciale Diamante (13 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest (12 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 27-minute advantage over Tesla Model 3 Long-Range on this 1760km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 56min vs 1h 20min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~287 kWh vs ~295 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons