In our Warsaw to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the VW ID. Buzz Pro by 108 minutes, completing the 1760km route in 17h 35min. The key advantage? 8 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 35min (108 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 56min
- Energy: ~287 kWh
- Distance: 1760km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
VW ID. Buzz Pro |
| Travel time |
17h 35min |
19h 23min |
| Charging time: |
56min |
2h 42min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~317 kWh |
~317 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 34% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Tankstelle Hirschstettner Straße (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Rome
VW ID. Buzz Pro Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 24% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 18% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
Signalbau (10 min, 13% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
Teplárny Brno Olympia DC (15 min, 14% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Raststation (10 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Tankstelle (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 8:
Electra Pizza Plus (11 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 9:
Ledra Ovest (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 10:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 11:
Castel Bentivoglio Ovest (11 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 12:
Ristorante Goyo (17 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 13:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (16 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 108-minute advantage over VW ID. Buzz Pro on this 1760km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 56min vs 2h 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~287 kWh vs ~401 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons