In our Warsaw to Rome EV duel, the Tesla Model Y Performance beats the Tesla Model S 85 by 333 minutes, completing the 1777km route in 18h 14min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model Y Performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model Y Performance
- Total time: 18h 14min (333 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 28min
- Energy: ~324 kWh
- Distance: 1777km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model S 85 |
Tesla Model Y Performance |
| Travel time |
23h 47min |
18h 14min |
| Charging time: |
6h 34min |
1h 28min |
| Charging stops: |
11 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~320 kWh |
~317 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model S 85 Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
M1 Shopping Center (53 min, 12% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Penny Ztracená (28 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV (47 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
eni Tankstelle Wiener Neustädter Straße (35 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger manufaktur matauschek (19 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Smatrics Sonnenkraft Campus (15 min, 10% → 25%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Maria-Gailer-Straße (23 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 8:
Smatrics Eurospar (50 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 9:
Ewiva Parco Commerciale Diamante (69 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 10:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest (45 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 11:
Supercharger La Pergola (10 min, 10% → 34%)
- Arrival: Rome
Tesla Model Y Performance Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Uniwar P1 (11 min, 13% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Olympia (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Raststation Bad Fischau (12 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Ledra Ovest (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (11 min, 17% → 58%)
-
Stop 7:
Badia Nuova Ovest (12 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger La Bettola del Buttero (10 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Tesla Model Y Performance Won
The Tesla Model Y Performance achieved a 333-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 85 on this 1777km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 28min vs 6h 34min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~324 kWh vs ~444 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons