In our Warsaw to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range by 63 minutes, completing the 1453km route in 16h 38min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 38min (63 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 1h 1min
- Energy: ~237 kWh
- Distance: 1453km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range |
| Travel time |
16h 38min |
17h 41min |
| Charging time: |
1h 1min |
2h 0min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~262 kWh |
~262 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Tesco Teplická cesta (16 min, 18% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 3:
Ledi MS (32 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
AMIC (10 min, 21% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland Wolkera (18 min, 17% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (20 min, 12% → 72%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV smer Beograd (41 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 6:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (21 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 63-minute advantage over Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range on this 1453km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 1min vs 2h 0min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~237 kWh vs ~249 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons