In our Warsaw to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 34 minutes, completing the 1453km route in 16h 29min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 29min (34 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 52min
- Energy: ~226 kWh
- Distance: 1453km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
16h 29min |
17h 3min |
| Charging time: |
52min |
1h 17min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~262 kWh |
~263 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Tesco Teplická cesta (13 min, 23% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Ledi MS (27 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (15 min, 33% → 77%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (18 min, 13% → 77%)
-
Stop 4:
JP Putevi Srbije (34 min, 10% → 88%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 34-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1453km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 52min vs 1h 17min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~226 kWh vs ~267 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons