In our Zagreb to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 5 minutes, completing the 895km route in 9h 49min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 49min (5 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 25min
- Energy: ~139 kWh
- Distance: 895km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
9h 54min |
9h 49min |
| Charging time: |
31min |
25min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~161 kWh |
~161 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lom west (Ljubljana - Koper) (10 min, 69% → 77%)
-
Stop 2:
Electriease Monte Alto Nord (10 min, 13% → 34%)
-
Stop 3:
Novate Nord (11 min, 12% → 61%)
- Arrival: Bern
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lom west (Ljubljana - Koper) (10 min, 71% → 79%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Via Carlo Cattaneo (15 min, 10% → 70%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 5-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 895km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 25min vs 31min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~139 kWh vs ~146 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons