In our Zagreb to Bern EV duel, the Audi e-tron GT beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 11 minutes, completing the 882km route in 10h 17min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi e-tron GT needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi e-tron GT
- Total time: 10h 17min (11 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 37min
- Energy: ~197 kWh
- Distance: 882km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi e-tron GT |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
10h 17min |
10h 28min |
| Charging time: |
37min |
59min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~159 kWh |
~162 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (14 min, 11% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Via Carlo Cattaneo (12 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Centro Calzaturiero (11 min, 10% → 52%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lom west (Ljubljana - Koper) (10 min, 53% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Be Charge Bazzera Nord (14 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Electriease Monte Alto Nord (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
Via Sumatra (15 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
ACW Auto-Center Visp (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi e-tron GT Won
The Audi e-tron GT achieved a 11-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 882km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 37min vs 59min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons