In our Zagreb to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 57 minutes, completing the 991km route in 13h 0min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 0min (57 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 1h 22min
- Energy: ~162 kWh
- Distance: 991km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
13h 0min |
13h 57min |
| Charging time: |
1h 22min |
1h 47min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~178 kWh |
~178 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
JP Putevi Srbije (10 min, 22% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Bulevardul Nicolae Iorga (72 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 12% → 46%)
-
Stop 2:
JP Putevi Srbije (26 min, 15% → 77%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Bulevardul Nicolae Iorga (28 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland (43 min, 10% → 70%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 57-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 991km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 22min vs 1h 47min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~162 kWh vs ~164 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons