In our Zagreb to Helsinki EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 131 minutes, completing the 2075km route in 25h 31min. The key advantage? 8 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 14 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 31min (131 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 16min
- Energy: ~323 kWh
- Distance: 2075km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
25h 31min |
27h 42min |
| Charging time: |
1h 16min |
3h 13min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
14 |
| Energy used |
~374 kWh |
~375 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
HPC Futurum (16 min, 15% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 3:
Blue City (20 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Neste (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
Neste Niidu (10 min, 19% → 59%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hofer (14 min, 19% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (11 min, 11% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Dobieszowice Wschód (12 min, 18% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Zajazd Plan (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Biedronka Fabryczna (41 min, 10% → 85%)
-
Stop 8:
MOP Rudniki Południe (14 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 9:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 22%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Circle K (15 min, 21% → 63%)
-
Stop 11:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 12:
IONITY Circle K Ādaži (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 13:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 14:
IONITY Circle K (14 min, 12% → 56%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 131-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 2075km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 14 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 16min vs 3h 13min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~323 kWh vs ~378 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons