In our Zagreb to Oslo EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 122 minutes, completing the 2010km route in 23h 11min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 11min (122 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 17min
- Energy: ~369 kWh
- Distance: 2010km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
| Travel time |
23h 11min |
25h 13min |
| Charging time: |
1h 17min |
3h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~362 kWh |
~363 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (10 min, 15% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Tankstelle Bergler (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 3:
Burger King Autohof Bitterfeld (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 12% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Burger King (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 23% → 63%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Importgatan (14 min, 15% → 70%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Kulturhaus Römerfeld (24 min, 32% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle (33 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 3:
Total Autohof Kleinhelmsdorf (13 min, 10% → 33%)
-
Stop 4:
TotalEnergies Autohof (32 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 5:
Raststätte Recknitz Ost (24 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger (20 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
McDonald's (18 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Max (18 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 122-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 2010km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 17min vs 3h 2min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~369 kWh vs ~378 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons