In our Zagreb to Prague EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 9 minutes, completing the 647km route in 7h 12min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 7h 12min (9 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 36min
- Energy: ~102 kWh
- Distance: 647km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
7h 21min |
7h 12min |
| Charging time: |
44min |
36min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~116 kWh |
~116 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Viertler (11 min, 16% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Hofer (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 3:
HPC Palasino (13 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
Am Oil (10 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Prague
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hofer (16 min, 11% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
HPC Palasino (20 min, 10% → 68%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 9-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 647km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 36min vs 44min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~102 kWh vs ~110 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons