In our Zagreb to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the BMW iX1 eDrive20 by 92 minutes, completing the 1680km route in 18h 21min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 18h 21min (92 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 5min
- Energy: ~274 kWh
- Distance: 1680km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
BMW iX1 eDrive20 |
| Travel time |
18h 21min |
19h 53min |
| Charging time: |
1h 5min |
2h 24min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~302 kWh |
~304 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
HPC Futurum (19 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 2:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Blue City (25 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Circle K (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Riga
BMW iX1 eDrive20 Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 11% → 43%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (21 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Dobieszowice Wschód (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Zajazd Plan (12 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
Biedronka Fabryczna (30 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 7:
MOP Rudniki Południe (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 22%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Circle K (14 min, 21% → 59%)
-
Stop 10:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 92-minute advantage over BMW iX1 eDrive20 on this 1680km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 5min vs 2h 24min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~274 kWh vs ~283 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons