In our Zagreb to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 119 minutes, completing the 1680km route in 18h 12min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 18h 12min (119 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 56min
- Energy: ~261 kWh
- Distance: 1680km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
18h 12min |
20h 11min |
| Charging time: |
56min |
2h 43min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~302 kWh |
~304 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
HPC Futurum (16 min, 15% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 3:
Blue City (20 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Riga
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hofer (14 min, 19% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (11 min, 11% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Dobieszowice Wschód (12 min, 18% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Zajazd Plan (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Biedronka Fabryczna (41 min, 10% → 85%)
-
Stop 8:
MOP Rudniki Południe (14 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 9:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 22%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Circle K (19 min, 21% → 70%)
-
Stop 11:
IONITY (10 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 119-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 1680km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 56min vs 2h 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~261 kWh vs ~306 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons