In our Zagreb to Sofia EV duel, the Tesla Model Y Long-Range beats the XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 by 17 minutes, completing the 788km route in 8h 0min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025's 468km range doesn't beat the Tesla Model Y Long-Range's 426km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range needs only 1 charging stops compared to 2 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model Y Long-Range
- Total time: 8h 0min (17 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 32min
- Energy: ~139 kWh
- Distance: 788km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model Y Long-Range |
XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 |
| Travel time |
8h 0min |
8h 17min |
| Charging time: |
32min |
40min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~142 kWh |
~143 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model Y Long-Range Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
JP Putevi Srbije (32 min, 16% → 85%)
- Arrival: Sofia
XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV A1 (10 min, 12% → 33%)
-
Stop 2:
JP Putevi Srbije (30 min, 23% → 97%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Tesla Model Y Long-Range Won
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range achieved a 17-minute advantage over XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 on this 788km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 2 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 32min vs 40min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~139 kWh vs ~155 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons