In our Zagreb to Warsaw EV duel, the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 10 minutes, completing the 1023km route in 11h 7min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge
- Total time: 11h 7min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 2min
- Energy: ~169 kWh
- Distance: 1023km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
11h 17min |
11h 7min |
| Charging time: |
1h 12min |
1h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~184 kWh |
~185 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hofer (15 min, 17% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Dobieszowice Wschód (14 min, 15% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Zajazd Plan (11 min, 10% → 46%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
JET Tankstelle Puchberger Straße (10 min, 14% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (10 min, 13% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Uniwar P1 (16 min, 11% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (16 min, 10% → 61%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Won
The Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge achieved a 10-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1023km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 2min vs 1h 12min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons