In our Amsterdam to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 28 minutes, completing the 812km route in 8h 24min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 1 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 8h 24min (28 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 16min
- Energy: ~133 kWh
- Distance: 812km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
8h 24min |
8h 52min |
| Charging time: |
16min |
44min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~146 kWh |
~146 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Tankstelle (16 min, 11% → 72%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Tankstelle Gewerbepark (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle (14 min, 11% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Renchtal West (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
GOFAST Basel-Ost (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 28-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 812km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 16min vs 44min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~133 kWh vs ~134 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons