In our Bern to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 30 minutes, completing the 811km route in 8h 23min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 1 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 8h 23min (30 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 16min
- Energy: ~132 kWh
- Distance: 811km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
8h 23min |
8h 53min |
| Charging time: |
16min |
44min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~146 kWh |
~146 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Moseltal Ost (16 min, 11% → 73%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Pfälzer Weinstraße Ost (14 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Shell Autohof (17 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY La Place / Gr8 Hotel (13 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 30-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 811km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 16min vs 44min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~132 kWh vs ~134 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons