In our Amsterdam to Bern EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 10 minutes, completing the 813km route in 9h 0min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 9h 0min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 53min
- Energy: ~129 kWh
- Distance: 813km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
9h 10min |
9h 0min |
| Charging time: |
1h 1min |
53min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~146 kWh |
~146 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle (15 min, 15% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Euro Rastpark Waldlaubersheim (11 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Pfälzer Weinstraße West (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Autohof Ettenheim-West (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
GOFAST Basel-Ost (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Peppenhoven West (14 min, 16% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle (17 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Renchtal West (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
GOFAST Basel-Ost (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 10-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 813km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 53min vs 1h 1min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~129 kWh vs ~138 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons