In our Amsterdam to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 92 minutes, completing the 1630km route in 16h 38min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 38min (92 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 45min
- Energy: ~254 kWh
- Distance: 1630km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
16h 38min |
18h 10min |
| Charging time: |
45min |
2h 13min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~293 kWh |
~294 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Pfälzer Weinstraße West, Edesheim (13 min, 13% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Migrol Rotzlochstrasse, Stans (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport, Guardamiglio (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Peppenhoven West, Rheinbach (14 min, 16% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle, Alzey (17 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Renchtal West, Appenweier (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
GOFAST Basel-Ost, Basel (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Rastplatz Amsteg, Silenen (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
GOFAST Swissminiatur, Melide (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 7:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport, Guardamiglio (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 8:
Secchia Ovest, Modena (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 9:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 10:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (14 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 92-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1630km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 45min vs 2h 13min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~254 kWh vs ~259 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons