In our Rome to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 95 minutes, completing the 1631km route in 16h 39min. The key advantage? 8 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 39min (95 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 46min
- Energy: ~254 kWh
- Distance: 1631km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
16h 39min |
18h 14min |
| Charging time: |
46min |
2h 12min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~294 kWh |
~295 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 36% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Lavorgo Nord (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
Norma (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
Moseltal Ost (14 min, 10% → 69%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 24% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Cantagallo Est (13 min, 16% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Lario Est (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Lavorgo Nord (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 6:
Rastplatz Knutwil Nord (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 7:
mblty Autohof Bremgarten (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 8:
Rasthof Bühl Ost (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 9:
Aral Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Brohltal Ost (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 11:
Shell Autohof Güdderath (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 12:
Greenpoint De Amert (10 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 95-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1631km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 46min vs 2h 12min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~254 kWh vs ~259 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons