In our Warsaw to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 97 minutes, completing the 1758km route in 17h 30min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 30min (97 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 51min
- Energy: ~274 kWh
- Distance: 1758km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
17h 30min |
19h 7min |
| Charging time: |
51min |
2h 26min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~316 kWh |
~318 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOL Kroměřížská (10 min, 12% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Raststation Bad Fischau (10 min, 15% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Electra Pizza Plus (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Eni (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 16% → 59%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 23% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
Uniwar P1 (18 min, 20% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Teplárny Brno Olympia DC (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Porsche Donaustadt (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 6:
Spar (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 7:
Electra Pizza Plus (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 8:
Ledra Ovest (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 10:
Castel Bentivoglio Ovest (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 11:
Ristorante Goyo (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 12:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (14 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 97-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1758km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 51min vs 2h 26min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~274 kWh vs ~280 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons