In our Warsaw to London EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 86 minutes, completing the 1635km route in 16h 23min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 23min (86 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 44min
- Energy: ~254 kWh
- Distance: 1635km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
16h 23min |
17h 49min |
| Charging time: |
44min |
2h 13min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~294 kWh |
~294 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle Friedenstraße (11 min, 11% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
toom Baumarkt (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Diksmuidestraat (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: London
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Orlen A2 MOP Tulce (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Walewice (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Circle K Autohof Ferch (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Auetal Nord (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 6:
Autohaus Weber (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 8:
BP De Beerze (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 9:
Lukoil Kortrijksesteenweg (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 10:
ENGIE Eurotunnel Main Terminal (18 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: London
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 86-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1635km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 44min vs 2h 13min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~254 kWh vs ~260 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons