In our Amsterdam to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 by 32 minutes, completing the 2113km route in 21h 10min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 10min (32 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 33min
- Energy: ~345 kWh
- Distance: 2113km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 |
| Travel time |
21h 10min |
21h 42min |
| Charging time: |
1h 33min |
1h 36min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~380 kWh |
~380 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Weiskirchen Süd (11 min, 15% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Seidl Confiserie (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 3:
Raststation Trieben (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (20 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV A1 (34 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Oberhonnefeld (10 min, 22% → 82%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Haidt Süd (10 min, 19% → 82%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Donautal West (10 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 4:
Raststation Kammern (10 min, 21% → 74%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Shell (11 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Martinci (21 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 7:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (24 min, 10% → 51%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 32-minute advantage over XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 on this 2113km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 33min vs 1h 36min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~345 kWh vs ~402 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons