In our Sofia to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 by 19 minutes, completing the 2117km route in 20h 59min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 59min (19 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 26min
- Energy: ~345 kWh
- Distance: 2117km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 |
| Travel time |
20h 59min |
21h 18min |
| Charging time: |
1h 26min |
1h 26min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~381 kWh |
~381 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (17 min, 69% → 89%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (20 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle Shopping City Seiersberg (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Donautal Ost (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (13 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 59% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV A1 (15 min, 16% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Emmezeta Jankomir (10 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tankstelle Shopping City Seiersberg (10 min, 38% → 86%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Donautal Ost (10 min, 15% → 82%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Haidt Nord (10 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 8:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (11 min, 10% → 84%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 19-minute advantage over XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 on this 2117km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~345 kWh vs ~403 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons