In our Athens to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 40 minutes, completing the 2366km route in 25h 16min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 16min (40 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 41min
- Energy: ~368 kWh
- Distance: 2366km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
25h 16min |
25h 56min |
| Charging time: |
1h 41min |
2h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~426 kWh |
~425 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Skotina dir Thessaloniki (10 min, 29% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Makpetrol A1 (25 min, 11% → 75%)
-
Stop 3:
JP Putevi Srbije (32 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 4:
Emmezeta Jankomir (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (12 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
Novate Nord (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Bern
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Skotina dir Thessaloniki (17 min, 15% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Makpetrol A1 (37 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 3:
JP Putevi Srbije (14 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesla Supercharger (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (16 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 7:
Novate Nord (13 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 40-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2366km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 41min vs 2h 2min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~368 kWh vs ~434 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons