In our Athens to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 62 minutes, completing the 2803km route in 31h 49min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 31h 49min (62 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 2h 1min
- Energy: ~436 kWh
- Distance: 2803km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
31h 49min |
32h 51min |
| Charging time: |
2h 1min |
2h 57min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~505 kWh |
~504 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Skotina dir Thessaloniki (10 min, 29% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Makpetrol A1 (28 min, 11% → 81%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Zemun Park (11 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Tesco (11 min, 32% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (16 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 7:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (25 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Skotina dir Thessaloniki (17 min, 15% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Makpetrol A1 (37 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 3:
JP Putevi Srbije (22 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Tesco (18 min, 27% → 77%)
-
Stop 6:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell MOP East (10 min, 16% → 48%)
-
Stop 8:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (19 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 9:
Kaufland (24 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 10:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 62-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2803km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 1min vs 2h 57min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~436 kWh vs ~515 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons