In our Athens to Vienna EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 94 minutes, completing the 1697km route in 17h 18min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 18min (94 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 2min
- Energy: ~264 kWh
- Distance: 1697km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
17h 18min |
18h 52min |
| Charging time: |
1h 2min |
2h 35min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~305 kWh |
~306 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Skotina dir Thessaloniki (10 min, 29% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Makpetrol A1 (28 min, 11% → 81%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Zemun Park (11 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (13 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell (13 min, 36% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Skotina dir Thessaloniki (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Makpetrol (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Makpetrol A1 (17 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (31 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Zemun Park (35 min, 10% → 94%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 8:
Páty Nord (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Győr (11 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 94-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1697km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 2min vs 2h 35min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~264 kWh vs ~267 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons