In our Barcelona to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 77 minutes, completing the 1360km route in 13h 31min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 31min (77 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 34min
- Energy: ~212 kWh
- Distance: 1360km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
13h 31min |
14h 48min |
| Charging time: |
34min |
1h 47min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~245 kWh |
~245 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Barcelona (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Mercure Beaumanoir (10 min, 14% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Ceriale Sud (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Parcheggio del Cimitero (14 min, 10% → 68%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Barcelona (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Bages (10 min, 26% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire d'Ambrussum Sud (10 min, 16% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Mercure Beaumanoir (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aire de Vidauban Sud (15 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Conioli Sud (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
Sant'Ilario Sud (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
Magra Ovest (15 min, 15% → 60%)
-
Stop 8:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 9:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (14 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 77-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1360km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 34min vs 1h 47min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~212 kWh vs ~216 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons