In our Barcelona to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 103 minutes, completing the 1861km route in 17h 47min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 47min (103 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 54min
- Energy: ~290 kWh
- Distance: 1861km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
17h 47min |
19h 30min |
| Charging time: |
54min |
2h 34min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~335 kWh |
~335 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Barcelona (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Tricastin (12 min, 19% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Aire du Jura (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
Park & Ride Pendlerparkplatz (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
BFS Business Fleet Services (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 5:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Barcelona (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Béziers-Montblanc Sud (11 min, 13% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire d'Estézargues Sud (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire De Livron (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aire de Lyon-Dagneux (18 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
Rue Monge (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Aire d'Ecot Sud (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
EnBW Esso Tankstelle (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 8:
ATU (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 9:
McDonald's (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 10:
Rastplatz Sophienberg Ost (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 11:
Hecht Einrichtungen (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 12:
TotalEnergies Autohof (11 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 103-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1861km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 54min vs 2h 34min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~290 kWh vs ~296 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons