In our Belgrade to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 106 minutes, completing the 1722km route in 16h 35min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 35min (106 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 51min
- Energy: ~268 kWh
- Distance: 1722km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
16h 35min |
18h 21min |
| Charging time: |
51min |
2h 26min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~310 kWh |
~312 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Maribor vzhod (10 min, 11% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 23% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Porsche Zentrum Regensburg (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Haidt Nord (10 min, 25% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (11 min, 15% → 63%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Tesla Supercharger (15 min, 38% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (18 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle Shopping City Seiersberg (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (18 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 6:
Porsche Zentrum Regensburg (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Aral Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 8:
Fastned Admira Center Aschaffenburg-Ost (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 9:
Nentershausen Ost (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 10:
Aral Tankstelle Bergische Landstraße (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 11:
Fastned Carpool Arnhem-Noord (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 106-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1722km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 51min vs 2h 26min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~268 kWh vs ~274 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons