In our Belgrade to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 66 minutes, completing the 1290km route in 13h 32min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 32min (66 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 42min
- Energy: ~211 kWh
- Distance: 1290km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
13h 32min |
14h 38min |
| Charging time: |
42min |
1h 28min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~232 kWh |
~230 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Lom west (Ljubljana - Koper) (10 min, 38% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Novate Nord (11 min, 10% → 61%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Tesla Supercharger (11 min, 43% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Emmezeta Jankomir (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 3:
Barje Sever (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (17 min, 11% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
Scaligera Nord (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Electra Via Carlo Cattaneo (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Centro Calzaturiero (14 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 66-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1290km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 42min vs 1h 28min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~211 kWh vs ~213 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons