In our Belgrade to Bratislava EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 10 minutes, completing the 570km route in 5h 41min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 5h 41min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 29min
- Energy: ~91 kWh
- Distance: 570km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
5h 51min |
5h 41min |
| Charging time: |
37min |
29min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~103 kWh |
~102 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (16 min, 16% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tópark (11 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
TEA. Győr M7 Hedoti Autohof (10 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 12% → 43%)
-
Stop 2:
Páty Nord (19 min, 11% → 65%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 10-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 570km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 29min vs 37min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~91 kWh vs ~97 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons