In our Belgrade to Helsinki EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 121 minutes, completing the 2107km route in 27h 30min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 27h 30min (121 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 23min
- Energy: ~328 kWh
- Distance: 2107km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
27h 30min |
29h 31min |
| Charging time: |
1h 23min |
3h 13min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~379 kWh |
~381 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Tesco (12 min, 27% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (16 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (25 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Neste (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
Neste Niidu (10 min, 19% → 59%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (12 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesco (22 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland Wolkera (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell MOP East (18 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 6:
Lakeside (34 min, 10% → 93%)
-
Stop 7:
MOP Rudniki Południe (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 8:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 25%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Circle K (14 min, 24% → 64%)
-
Stop 10:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 11:
IONITY Circle K Ādaži (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 12:
Rimi Niidu (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 13:
Neste Pääsküla (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 121-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 2107km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 23min vs 3h 13min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~328 kWh vs ~332 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons