In our Belgrade to Oslo EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 65 minutes, completing the 2213km route in 25h 32min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 32min (65 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 37min
- Energy: ~406 kWh
- Distance: 2213km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
26h 37min |
25h 32min |
| Charging time: |
2h 40min |
1h 37min |
| Charging stops: |
13 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~398 kWh |
~398 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Shell (18 min, 14% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
ZSE Motor-Car Lamač (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
OC Karlov (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
Burger King Kutnohorská (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
Esso Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Am Kahlberg Ost (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger SB Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 8:
HEM Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 9:
Burger King (11 min, 15% → 46%)
-
Stop 10:
Fastned Barbecue barn (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 11:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 12:
Supercharger Importgatan (15 min, 12% → 52%)
-
Stop 13:
Shell Svinesundparken (10 min, 10% → 37%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Páty Nord (10 min, 19% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Győr (13 min, 24% → 72%)
-
Stop 3:
ČEZ Mikulášov sever (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Esso Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
Væggerløsevej (17 min, 11% → 74%)
-
Stop 7:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Tradenvägen (10 min, 14% → 58%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 65-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 2213km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 37min vs 2h 40min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~406 kWh vs ~410 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons