In our Berlin to Athens EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 165 minutes, completing the 2324km route in 23h 43min. The key advantage? 11 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 16 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 43min (165 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 40min
- Energy: ~362 kWh
- Distance: 2324km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
23h 43min |
26h 28min |
| Charging time: |
1h 40min |
3h 51min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
16 |
| Energy used |
~418 kWh |
~419 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
B.C.S. (18 min, 12% → 77%)
-
Stop 2:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Ledi MS (27 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 4:
Makpetrol A1 (19 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
Skotina dir Athen (24 min, 10% → 81%)
- Arrival: Athens
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
SachsenEnergie City Center (10 min, 41% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
MOL Bělčice (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 3:
OC Karlov (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
Bory Mall (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Bábolna (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (22 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Backa Topola jug (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV smer Beograd (18 min, 14% → 57%)
-
Stop 9:
Gazprom (26 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 10:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (21 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 11:
Makpetrol A1 (17 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 12:
Makpetrol (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 13:
Korinos dir Athen (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 14:
Skotina dir Athen (15 min, 33% → 71%)
-
Stop 15:
Shell (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 16:
Atalanti Süd (11 min, 19% → 53%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 165-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 2324km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 16 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 40min vs 3h 51min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~362 kWh vs ~370 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons