In our Berlin to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 33 minutes, completing the 918km route in 9h 14min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 14min (33 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 20min
- Energy: ~150 kWh
- Distance: 918km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
9h 14min |
9h 47min |
| Charging time: |
20min |
53min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~165 kWh |
~167 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 25% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Empfinger Hof (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Frankenwald West (10 min, 16% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 19% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 13% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Schönbuch West (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle (13 min, 13% → 55%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 33-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 918km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 20min vs 53min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~150 kWh vs ~152 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons