In our Berlin to Brussels EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 29 minutes, completing the 756km route in 7h 16min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 1 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 7h 16min (29 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 12min
- Energy: ~123 kWh
- Distance: 756km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
7h 16min |
7h 45min |
| Charging time: |
12min |
38min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~136 kWh |
~137 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Euro Rastpark, Lippetal (12 min, 17% → 68%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Magic Spielhalle, Garbsen (11 min, 16% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Euro Rastpark, Lippetal (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
P&R Parkplatz Alfred-Wirth-Straße, Erkelenz (14 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 29-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 756km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 12min vs 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~123 kWh vs ~125 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons