In our Berlin to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 105 minutes, completing the 1676km route in 17h 26min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 26min (105 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 47min
- Energy: ~261 kWh
- Distance: 1676km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
17h 26min |
19h 11min |
| Charging time: |
47min |
2h 27min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~302 kWh |
~302 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
B.C.S. (14 min, 12% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tópark (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (Truck) (12 min, 11% → 64%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MoBi-Punkt Liststraße (10 min, 43% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
MOL Bělčice (10 min, 11% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
OC Karlov (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
ZSE Motor-Car Lamač (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Bábolna (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (28 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 7:
Rompetrol A1 Sagu Sens Timisoara (29 min, 10% → 85%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (20 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 9:
Kaufland Gavana (11 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 105-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1676km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 47min vs 2h 27min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~261 kWh vs ~264 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons