In our Bucharest to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 99 minutes, completing the 1675km route in 17h 28min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 28, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 28min (99 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 52min
- Energy: ~261 kWh
- Distance: 1675km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
17h 28min |
19h 7min |
| Charging time: |
52min |
2h 32min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~302 kWh |
~302 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (12 min, 22% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Lamačská cesta (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Hansastraße (10 min, 19% → 50%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOL Pitesti 3 (10 min, 75% → 90%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (Truck) (27 min, 21% → 87%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV DN69 (19 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Páty Nord (19 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
ZSE Motor-Car Lamač (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 7:
OC Karlov (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 8:
Burger King Kutnohorská (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 9:
Esso Tankstelle (20 min, 10% → 68%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 99-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1675km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 52min vs 2h 32min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~261 kWh vs ~264 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons