In our Berlin to Dublin EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 6 minutes, completing the 1669km route in 19h 37min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 37min (6 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 2min
- Energy: ~272 kWh
- Distance: 1669km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
19h 37min |
19h 43min |
| Charging time: |
1h 2min |
1h 12min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~300 kWh |
~300 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Euro Rastpark (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Lukoil (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
ENGIE Eurotunnel Main Terminal (11 min, 14% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Poplars Garden Centre (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Mountain Park Hotel (10 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Sir John Rogerson's Quay (10 min, 10% → 18%)
- Arrival: Dublin
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Gütersloh Nord (11 min, 14% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned De Beerze (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Lukoil Kortrijksesteenweg (10 min, 29% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Village Hotel (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Poplars Garden Centre (10 min, 28% → 65%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Mountain Park Hotel (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
Sir John Rogerson's Quay (10 min, 10% → 18%)
- Arrival: Dublin
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 6-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1669km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 2min vs 1h 12min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~272 kWh vs ~306 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons