In our Berlin to Helsinki EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 64 minutes, completing the 1441km route in 20h 50min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 50min (64 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 6min
- Energy: ~265 kWh
- Distance: 1441km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
20h 50min |
21h 54min |
| Charging time: |
1h 6min |
2h 8min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~259 kWh |
~260 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OTO Park Handlowy (10 min, 35% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell (28 min, 17% → 88%)
-
Stop 3:
VS Express (14 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Neste (14 min, 10% → 69%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OTO Park Handlowy (13 min, 12% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Krauz Oil (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka (40 min, 20% → 87%)
-
Stop 4:
Norfa XL Bernotiškės (22 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 5:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
Neste Lucavsala (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 7:
Neste (10 min, 11% → 48%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Circle K (13 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 64-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1441km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 6min vs 2h 8min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons