In our Helsinki to Berlin EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 81 minutes, completing the 1444km route in 20h 40min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 40min (81 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 57min
- Energy: ~265 kWh
- Distance: 1444km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
20h 40min |
22h 1min |
| Charging time: |
57min |
2h 23min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~260 kWh |
~259 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (11 min, 18% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Vilniaus (20 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Auchan Gdańsk Szczęśliwa (16 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Stacja Paliw WATIS (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (17 min, 19% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Livonija (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
Circle K (66 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Krauz Oil (11 min, 18% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
OTO Park Handlowy (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
Stacja Paliw Moya Rymarska (11 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 81-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1444km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 57min vs 2h 23min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons