In our Berlin to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 43 minutes, completing the 986km route in 13h 4min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 4min (43 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 20min
- Energy: ~153 kWh
- Distance: 986km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
13h 4min |
13h 47min |
| Charging time: |
20min |
1h 14min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~177 kWh |
~178 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Importgatan (10 min, 19% → 60%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Parkplatz P2 Seehafen (10 min, 28% → 44%)
-
Stop 2:
Burger King (13 min, 16% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Barbecue barn (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Importgatan (19 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Svinesundparken (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 43-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 986km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 20min vs 1h 14min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~153 kWh vs ~157 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons