In our Berlin to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 5 minutes, completing the 1044km route in 13h 14min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 14min (5 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 33min
- Energy: ~162 kWh
- Distance: 1044km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
13h 19min |
13h 14min |
| Charging time: |
40min |
33min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~188 kWh |
~187 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Kaufland (10 min, 21% → 32%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell (20 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 3:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Auchan Gdańsk Szczęśliwa (23 min, 13% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
Maxima Rūdės (10 min, 10% → 36%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 5-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 1044km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 33min vs 40min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~162 kWh vs ~170 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons