In our Riga to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 14 minutes, completing the 1044km route in 12h 56min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 56min (14 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 22min
- Energy: ~162 kWh
- Distance: 1044km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
13h 10min |
12h 56min |
| Charging time: |
33min |
22min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~188 kWh |
~188 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Livonija (10 min, 83% → 90%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Stacja Paliw WATIS (13 min, 13% → 67%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Stacja Paliw WATIS (12 min, 14% → 64%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 14-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 1044km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 22min vs 33min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~162 kWh vs ~170 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons