In our Berlin to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron 55 by 82 minutes, completing the 1509km route in 14h 37min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 37min (82 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 41min
- Energy: ~235 kWh
- Distance: 1509km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron 55 |
| Travel time |
14h 37min |
15h 59min |
| Charging time: |
41min |
2h 4min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~272 kWh |
~267 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle Schollstraße, Ingolstadt (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Raststation Europabrücke, Schönberg im Stubaital (11 min, 11% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Electra Mantova Village, Bagnolo San Vito (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (10 min, 17% → 60%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Frankenwald West, Berg (10 min, 15% → 42%)
-
Stop 2:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle, Schnaittach (19 min, 11% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle Garmischer Straße, München (15 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Hofer, Schönberg im Stubaital (25 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 5:
Garda Ovest, Cavaion Veronese (24 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 6:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (16 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 7:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (15 min, 10% → 51%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 82-minute advantage over Audi e-tron 55 on this 1509km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 41min vs 2h 4min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~235 kWh vs ~372 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons