In our Rome to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron 55 by 82 minutes, completing the 1507km route in 14h 37min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 37min (82 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 42min
- Energy: ~235 kWh
- Distance: 1507km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron 55 |
| Travel time |
14h 37min |
15h 59min |
| Charging time: |
42min |
2h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~271 kWh |
~267 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Povegliano Est (11 min, 16% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Green Deer Bavarian Hotel (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Audi e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Arno Est (19 min, 32% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
Povegliano Est (18 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
Isarco Est / Eisack Ost (11 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 4:
Al Tornante Panorama Restaurant & Pizzeria (20 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 6:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (17 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 7:
Hecht Einrichtungen (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
TotalEnergies Autohof (11 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 82-minute advantage over Audi e-tron 55 on this 1507km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 42min vs 2h 2min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~235 kWh vs ~371 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons