In our Berlin to Rome EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron 50 by 121 minutes, completing the 1490km route in 14h 50min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 31, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 50min (121 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 54min
- Energy: ~274 kWh
- Distance: 1490km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi e-tron 50 |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
16h 51min |
14h 50min |
| Charging time: |
2h 47min |
54min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~268 kWh |
~272 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi e-tron 50 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Burger King Autohof Kleinhelmsdorf, Heidegrund (15 min, 13% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle, Marktschorgast (18 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Esso Tankstelle, Greding (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle Garmischer Straße, München (19 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 5:
Hofer, Schönberg im Stubaital (21 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 6:
Eni Paganella Ovest, Stazione di Lavis (17 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 7:
Electra Old Wild West, San Giorgio Bigarello (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 8:
Cantagallo Ovest, Casalecchio di Reno (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 9:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (20 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 10:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (19 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle, Marktschorgast (10 min, 29% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle Schollstraße, Ingolstadt (10 min, 31% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle, Gries am Brenner (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Electra Old Wild West, San Giorgio Bigarello (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (12 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 121-minute advantage over Audi e-tron 50 on this 1490km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 54min vs 2h 47min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~274 kWh vs ~360 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons